I have been following this discussion and think we are getting into some semantic weeds. As to your picture, which by the way, I like very much, it has a subject: ceiling shapes. Photography is, to my way of thinking, nothing but subject. The photographers choices in presenting the subject determine if the picture is abstract, representational, documentary, banal or beautiful.
I like comments, especially constructive ones. Comments get emailed directly to me before publishing , so if you want to get in touch drop a comment. All comments moderated by me before being published, keeps the spam at bay.
I'm Martin Doonan, a Chemical Engineer by profession who enjoys photography and outdoor pursuits. My photographic aims are twofold: firstly to show the interesting ways in which people behave and interact with one another on a day-to-day basis (the fundament of my street photography); secondly (and more importantly to me) to demonstrate the ways in which nature shows beauty. It is my view of how the World is.
Well, Mark Rothko seems to get by rather well with just solid colors. Then again, he's a painter, I guess.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Rothko
As did Mondriaan and a host of others, but indeed they weren't photographers.
ReplyDeleteI have been following this discussion and think we are getting into some semantic weeds. As to your picture, which by the way, I like very much, it has a subject: ceiling shapes. Photography is, to my way of thinking, nothing but subject. The photographers choices in presenting the subject determine if the picture is abstract, representational, documentary, banal or beautiful.
ReplyDelete