tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1721344177867541891.post9109421167538199652..comments2023-03-26T23:43:26.524+08:00Comments on doonster: Pictures & thoughts: Considered randomnessdoonsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04558926453149764893noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1721344177867541891.post-80065794404051909052008-01-20T02:01:00.000+08:002008-01-20T02:01:00.000+08:00Your right of course, the point I would make is th...Your right of course, the point I would make is that she doesn't "get all analytical" as she puts it. It's more of an instinctive "arty" approach, whatever that means. Probably not the best words, but I'm sure you know what I am trying to convey!Rich Gift Of Linshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17868005278180471114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1721344177867541891.post-72640456346150720662008-01-19T21:35:00.000+08:002008-01-19T21:35:00.000+08:00I hadn't thought of it that way. However, isn't yo...I hadn't thought of it that way. However, isn't your wife response still considered response if she decides it is worth picturing? I think <I>considered randomness</I> can be as much about an instinctive response to the surroundings as a length study in composition (maybe more so).doonsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04558926453149764893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1721344177867541891.post-43214976869898903132008-01-19T21:20:00.000+08:002008-01-19T21:20:00.000+08:00It's hard because the engineer in you makes it so,...It's hard because the engineer in you makes it so, I have the same problem! My wife had absolutely no problem including valuable random content in her pictures, but I'm not sure she considers it, rather it's just a response to her surroundings at the time. It's most frustrating.Rich Gift Of Linshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17868005278180471114noreply@blogger.com